PH Environmentalist lambasted anti-environment proposals of members of the congress

No Bun Pilipinas members calls on PH congress to scrap bill seeking repeal of incineration ban. Image © Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives

A COALITION of environmentalist groups nationwide demanded the scrapping of the regressive moves in the House of Representatives seeking the repeal of the ban in waste incineration, a garbage disposal process which has been proven to be disastrous for the environment and people.

The demand was recently made in a press conference by No Burn Pilipinas, a coalition of 50 civil society groups seeking the non-passage of House Bill 2286, which seeks to repeal the incineration ban enshrined in Republic Act 8749, otherwise known as the Clean Air Act.

Moreover, No Burn Pilipinas charged that the proposed bill also seeks to amend Republic Act 9003 (the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act) in order to allow the setting up of “Waste to Energy” (WtE) incineration facilities in the country, a move that is ironically being promoted by the supposed guardian of the country’s environment, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and President Rodrigo Duterte.

(Read More:

The coalition noted that the DENR’s promotion of WtE is not only regressive but also runs counter to their mandate to ensure a healthy environment for Filipinos.

“Repealing the incineration ban is bad news for the environment, public health and local communities,” said Von Hernandez, Global coordinator of the Break Free from Plastic movement, a member organization of the coalition.

“It represents a regressive move on the part of Congress, at a time when the planet is in dire need of genuine solutions to the climate and waste crisis. Worse, it presents a triple whammy for Filipinos as so-called WtE plants translate to higher electricity costs, higher waste disposal fees, and higher risks of cancer for host communities,” Hernandez said.

He also decried that no less than the DENR is paving the way for the resurgence of waste incineration proposals in the country, which the DENR currently promotes as “waste-to-energy,” pyrolysis or gasification plants.

“It is scandalous that the government agency mandated to implement our environmental laws is the same one working hard to undermine the spirit and intent of such laws,” he said.

Burning waste has many negative health, environmental, social, and economic consequences. Incinerators threaten human health, pollute our air, harm our economies, contribute significantly to global warming, and fuel an unsustainable system of consumption and wasting.

Ecowaste Coalition coordinator Aileen Lucero ©

Aileen Lucero, EcoWaste Coalition national coordinator, said “the push to revoke the incineration ban will undermine source segregation, recycling and other Zero Waste strategies that conserve resources, avoid toxic pollution and generate livelihoods and jobs. Instead of overturning the prohibition on waste burning, Congress should, in fact, strengthen it by passing waste prevention and reduction measures complementing RA 9003 such as banning single-use plastic bags, disallowing recyclable and compostable materials in disposal facilities, curbing e-waste, and incentivizing innovations in waste management sector.”

Experiences around the world have also shown that WtE through incineration is the most expensive and most energy-intensive way to manage waste and generate electricity. Incinerators are capital intensive and are more expensive than coal and nuclear facilities.

According to the United States Energy Information Administration, the projected capital cost of new waste incinerator facilities is twice the cost of coal-fired power plants and 60% more than the cost of nuclear energy facilities. Waste incinerator operations and maintenance costs are 10 times the cost for coal plants and four times the cost of nuclear plants.

Lea Guerrero, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) Climate and Clean Energy campaigner, said: “incinerators are a costly folly. Should these facilities be built in the Philippines the budget will be in the tens of billions of pesos. There will also be massive increases in tipping fees by local government units (LGUs) who are already stretched for funds. Clearly, it’s a bad investment given that it’s also the wrong way to manage waste.”

“A better alternative remains the strict implementation of the law,” said Sonia Mendoza, Mother Earth Foundation (MEF) chairperson.

“Implementing Zero Waste solutions is inexpensive and can be started immediately. If properly implemented, results can be seen in a few months as in the case of the City of San Fernando in Pampanga. We are calling on other LGUs to reject all incineration and WtE proposals, and instead pursue the Zero Waste approach, starting with the strict implementation of RA 9003.”


One Comment

  1. Pingback: PH Environmentalist lambasted anti-environment proposals of members of the congress - Duterte Daily

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.